Vassilaki, D.I.[Dimitra I.],
Matching and Evaluating Free-form Linear Features for Georeferencing
Space-borne SAR Imagery,
PFG(2012), No. 4, 2012, pp. 408-419.
WWW Link.
1211
BibRef
Vassilaki, D.I.,
Stamos, A.A.,
The 0.4 Arc-Sec Tandem-X Intermediate DEM with Respect to the SRTM and
Aster Global DEMS,
PIA15(253-259).
DOI Link
1504
BibRef
Vassilaki, D.I.,
Stamos, A.A.,
Ioannidis, C.C.,
Rapid Geometric Correction of SSC TERRASAR-X Images with Direct
Georeferencing, Global DEM and Global Geoid Models,
Hannover13(357-362).
DOI Link
1308
BibRef
And: A1, A3, A2:
Evaluation of SAR Data as Source of Ground Control Information:
First Results,
Hannover13(363-367).
DOI Link
1308
BibRef
Earlier: A1, A3, A2:
Georeference of TerraSAR-X Images using Networks of Ground Control
Linear Features,
HighRes11(xx-yy).
PDF File.
1106
See also Enhanced first approximation for ICP-based global matching of free-form curves in side-looking radar geometry.
BibRef
Wu, Q.[Qiong],
Wang, H.Y.[Hong-Yao],
Wang, B.[Bin],
Chen, S.B.[Sheng-Bo],
Li, H.Q.[Hong-Qing],
Performance Comparison of Geoid Refinement between XGM2016 and
EGM2008 Based on the KTH and RCR Methods: Jilin Province, China,
RS(12), No. 2, 2020, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2001
BibRef
Vu, D.T.[Dinh Toan],
Bruinsma, S.[Sean],
Bonvalot, S.[Sylvain],
Remy, D.[Dominique],
Vergos, G.S.[Georgios S.],
A Quasigeoid-Derived Transformation Model Accounting for Land
Subsidence in the Mekong Delta towards Height System Unification in
Vietnam,
RS(12), No. 5, 2020, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2003
BibRef
Erol, S.[Serdar],
Özögel, E.[Emrah],
Kuçak, R.A.[Ramazan Alper],
Erol, B.[Bihter],
Utilizing Airborne LiDAR and UAV Photogrammetry Techniques in Local
Geoid Model Determination and Validation,
IJGI(9), No. 9, 2020, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2009
BibRef
Trojanowicz, M.[Marek],
Owczarek-Wesolowska, M.[Magdalena],
Wang, Y.M.[Yan Ming],
Jamroz, O.[Olgierd],
Quasi Geoid and Geoid Modeling with the Use of Terrestrial and
Airborne Gravity Data by the GGI Method: A Case Study in the
Mountainous Area of Colorado,
RS(13), No. 21, 2021, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2112
BibRef
Lyszkowicz, A.[Adam],
Nastula, J.[Jolanta],
Zielinski, J.B.[Janusz B.],
Birylo, M.[Monika],
A New Model of Quasigeoid for the Baltic Sea Area,
RS(13), No. 13, 2021, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2107
BibRef
Alcantar-Elizondo, N.[Norberto],
Garcia-Lopez, R.V.[Ramon Victorino],
Torres-Carillo, X.G.[Xochitl Guadalupe],
Vazquez-Becerra, G.E.[Guadalupe Esteban],
Combining Global Geopotential Models, Digital Elevation Models, and
GNSS/Leveling for Precise Local Geoid Determination in Some Mexico
Urban Areas: Case Study,
IJGI(10), No. 12, 2021, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2112
BibRef
Liu, Y.S.[Yu-Sheng],
Lou, L.Z.[Li-Zhi],
Unified Land-Ocean Quasi-Geoid Computation from Heterogeneous
Data Sets Based on Radial Basis Functions,
RS(14), No. 13, 2022, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2208
BibRef
Varbla, S.[Sander],
Liibusk, A.[Aive],
Ellmann, A.[Artu],
Shipborne GNSS-Determined Sea Surface Heights Using Geoid Model and
Realistic Dynamic Topography,
RS(14), No. 10, 2022, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2206
BibRef
Wu, Y.H.[Yi-Hao],
He, X.[Xiufeng],
Huang, J.[Jia],
Shi, H.K.[Hong-Kai],
Wang, H.[Haihong],
Wu, Y.L.[Yun-Long],
Ding, Y.[Yuan],
Comparison of Mean Dynamic Topography Modeling from Multivariate
Objective Analysis and Rigorous Least Squares Method,
RS(14), No. 21, 2022, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2212
Sea surface and geoid combination.
BibRef
Wu, Q.[Qiong],
Zhang, G.Y.[Guo-Yu],
Wang, B.[Bin],
Zhong, L.S.[Lin-Shan],
Xiao, F.[Feng],
Performance Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Modifications
in Stokes's and Hotine's Formulas: The Case of Jilin Province, China,
RS(15), No. 2, 2023, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2301
Geoid model.
BibRef
Natsiopoulos, D.A.[Dimitrios A.],
Mamagiannou, E.G.[Elisavet G.],
Pitenis, E.A.[Eleftherios A.],
Vergos, G.S.[Georgios S.],
Tziavos, I.N.[Ilias N.],
GOCE Downward Continuation to the Earth's Surface and Improvements to
Local Geoid Modeling by FFT and LSC,
RS(15), No. 4, 2023, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2303
BibRef
Liu, X.Y.[Xin-Yu],
Li, S.S.[Shan-Shan],
Yuan, J.J.[Jia-Jia],
Fan, D.[Diao],
Tan, X.L.[Xu-Li],
Estimation of Geopotential Value W0 for the Geoid and Local Vertical
Datum Parameters,
RS(15), No. 4, 2023, pp. xx-yy.
DOI Link
2303
Geoid determination.
BibRef
Pa'suya, M.F.,
Din, A.H.M.,
McCubbine, J.C.,
Omar, A.H.,
Amin, Z.M.,
Yahaya, N.A.Z.,
Gravimetric Geoid Modelling Over Peninsular Malaysia Using Two
Different Gridding Approaches for Combining Free Air Anomaly,
GGT19(515-522).
DOI Link
1912
BibRef
Ismail, M.K.,
Din, A.H.M.,
Uti, M.N.,
Omar, A.H.,
Establishment of New Fitted Geoid Model In Universiti Teknologi
Malaysia,
GeoDisast18(27-33).
DOI Link
1901
BibRef
Yazid, N.M.,
Din, A.H.M.,
Omar, K.M.,
Som, Z.A.M.,
Omar, A.H.,
Yahaya, N.A.Z.,
Tugi, A.,
Marine Geoid Undulation Assessment over South China Sea Using Global
Geopotential Models and Airborne Gravity Data,
GGT16(253-263).
DOI Link
1612
BibRef
Lee, S.,
Kim, J.,
Jung, Y.,
Choi, J.,
Choi, C.,
Implementation of The Distributed Parallel Program for Geoid Heights
Computation Using MPI and Openmp,
ISPRS12(XXXIX-B4:225-229).
DOI Link
1209
BibRef
Hilger, K.B.,
Nielsen, A.A.,
Knudsen, P.,
Aspects of Remote Sensing in the GEOid and Sea level of the North
Atlantic Region (GEOSONAR) Project,
SCIA99(Remote Sensing).
BibRef
9900
Chapter on Remote Sensing General Issue, Land Use, Land Cover continues in
Water Quality, Turbidity, Water Areas .